Ethics of Culling Doubled-crested Cormorants Essay - 1

Ethics of Culling Doubled-crested Cormorants - Essay ExampleWhile the culling of DCCO can be confirm as a necessity for the protection of rare plant feel, it runs against the grain of the ethic of equal consideration. all living beings experience pain and humans do not have any moral proper to cause pain to any other form of life.The action of culling DCCO is tantamount to speciesist action on the helping of us humans. Through this action however what humans believe are of importance is interpreted into consideration. The interest of DCCO within the species other than the human species is not considered important, and so ignored. The preserving of rare plant life places a utilitarian halo on the culling of DCCO, but in actuality it negates the ethic of equal consideration, and places a question grunge on the moral rightness of the action.Ethical considerations act as a guide for action and behavioural attitudes that one should adopt for harmonious cohabitation in an environmen t. Thus, from the viewpoint of existence injustice some animals do not demonstrate a capacity for ethical functioning and reciprocation for harmonious cohabitation in an environment. This makes it difficult to turn in the ethic of equality to all living beings (Singer, 49).However, while applying morality to all living beings and justifying the use of ethics, it is only applicable to those living beings that are receptive of reciprocating ethics in the form of human beings, and excluding those incapable of it, core all other forms of life. Furthermore, in the application of ethics personal interests and interests of a particular group or species are to be disregarded. There is the deficit among humans that value is given only to living beings capable of the display of ethical reciprocity. There are no moral grounds for basing value on the ethics of reciprocity (Springer, 20).. While DCCO are not justified in the danger they pose to the plant life on the island, they